top of page
ICPLSS 2025 banner.jpg

About ICPLSS 2025

The 2025 International Conference on Politics, Law, and Social Science (ICPLSS 2025) will be held in Singapore from August 22nd to 24th, 2025. This international conference offers a platform for academics, researchers, and practitioners worldwide to discuss critical issues and advances in the fields of politics, law, communication and social science. It aims to promote the exchange of ideas and foster collaboration on the latest research, policies, and global challenges.

​

ICPLSS 2025 invites a diverse group of participants to explore significant topics such as political theory and governance, international law, social justice, human rights, social policies, and the evolving dynamics of society and culture. The conference will highlight current trends, new theories, and emerging issues in these interconnected fields, offering a comprehensive perspective on global politics and social structures.

​

Scholars, policymakers, and professionals in law and social sciences will have the opportunity to share their research findings, discuss emerging trends, and engage in thought-provoking discussions that contribute to advancing knowledge in these fields. This conference aims to enhance understanding and promote dialogue on pressing global issues that impact societies and governance structures worldwide.

​

We look forward to welcoming you to ICPLSS 2025 for a dynamic and enriching academic experience that will shape the future of politics, law, and social science research.

Clients

Important Dates

Full Paper Submission Date:

Jun. 6, 2025

Notification of Acceptance Date:

Jul. 1, 2025

Final Paper Submission Date:

Jul. 20, 2025

Registration Deadline:

Aug. 5, 2025

Conference Date:

Aug. 22-24, 2025

publication

All accepted and presented papers will be published together with 2025 International Conference on Politics, Law, and Social Science (ICPLSS 2025) in digital conference proceedings, which will be submitted to CPCI (Web of Science) (Subject to acceptance - as for all proceedings journals), DOAJ, EBSCO, ProQuest, CNKI and Google Scholar for indexing. 

​

The accepted papers, both invited and contributed, will be included and published in Conference Proceedings. All conference proceedings paper can not be less than 4 pages. 

Reviewing Process

By submitting a paper to ICEPCC 2025, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the conference committee, who will give detailed comments, and if the submission gets acceptance, the authors submit a revised version that takes into account this feedback. All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process. The Committees of ICEPCC 2025 invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organizing the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.

Peer Review Process Overview

The proceeding adheres to a rigorous, double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and ethical standards. Key steps are outlined below:

  1. Manuscript Allocation: Within one week after submission, the Editor-in-Chief assigns each manuscript to 2–3 independent reviewers with expertise aligned to the paper’s topic. Reviewers must declare no conflicts of interest (e.g., collaborations, institutional affiliations, or financial ties with authors) prior to participation.

  2. Initial Screening (1 week): Reviewers conduct a preliminary check for compliance with formatting guidelines, structural completeness (abstract, methods, results, etc.), and thematic relevance. Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards are desk-rejected, with detailed feedback provided to authors.

  3. In-Depth Evaluation (3 weeks): Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological validity, data integrity, and contribution to the field. Evaluations include:

    • A categorical rating (Accept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject)

    • Constructive comments for improvement

    • A confidential recommendation to the Editor

  4. Decision-Making & Conflict Resolution: The Editor consolidates reviews and resolves discrepancies through panel discussions. Final decisions prioritize both scholarly rigor and a target acceptance rate of [40%], which balances selectivity with support for emerging research. Borderline manuscripts may undergo additional review or statistical validation.

  5. Author Notification: Authors receive a decision within 1-week post-review, including anonymized reviewer comments. Accepted manuscripts proceed to production; others may be invited to resubmit after revision (2-month revision window).

  6. Revisions & Appeals: Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated within 2 weeks. Authors may appeal decisions with a point-by-point rebuttal, which triggers an independent audit by the Editorial Board.

sponsor

CIC 主LOGO.png
Cambridge Innovation Center(CIC)
bottom of page